• FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because money/practical limitations: It costs more to make them and in ye olden times I’m not sure they had the technology to make a reliable vertical axis turbine.

    They do exist these days, but aren’t as common because they’re more expensive and complicated (which also means more maintenance, which further adds to the long-term cost).

  • Karmmah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess it could be that it’s easier to build. You have a tower that only gives structural support and you have a gondola that only deals with all the rotation. In general it is difficult to have something that rotates and also carries a large load. And the rotating gondola technology is a solved problem. Plus you have a large rotor area that is always facing the wind instead of half your blade area going opposite to the wind. These are just guesses though.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    Ελληνικά
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They aren’t as efficient that way. Horizontal axis wind turbines most of the time have their whole “swept area” in unobstructed airflow. For vertical turbines the blades pass into the turbulent air from the other blades and the vertical post.

    The swept area of a horizontal turbine is increases more for a given amount of additional blade length than a vertical turbine as well. Extending the radius of a circle creates more swept area than an equivalent increase of length or width of a rectangle.

  • Avialle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess you would have to canalize the wind, cause it would press against the entire wheel. In which direction should it turn when you don’t want to construct something more complex to have more pressure on only one side of the wheel.