weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoWhysub.wetshaving.socialexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1361arrow-down17
arrow-up1354arrow-down1external-linkWhysub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agoMore pixels, since OP is too lazy
minus-squarechuckleslord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoIs it not a known issue that photos in posts have bad resolution? It’s always been an issue.
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 months agoThat absolves people from continuing that exact issue? It takes mere seconds to find a better copy, if not the original.
minus-squareKarl@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoThe quality really isn’t that bad tho. I mean, you can still read it.
More pixels, since OP is too lazy
Is it not a known issue that photos in posts have bad resolution? It’s always been an issue.
That absolves people from continuing that exact issue?
It takes mere seconds to find a better copy, if not the original.
The quality really isn’t that bad tho. I mean, you can still read it.