I found this article pretty interesting… it seems to contradict the current cooking zeitgeist

  • shadmere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, the study said it has no effect on the stickiness of the rice.

    Which is bizarre, because I’ve…seen it. Like repeatedly. And it’s not a subtle difference. When I am lazy and don’t wash my rice, it comes out MUCH gooier. It’s not terrible but it’s significantly different than when I wash it well.

    Is this going to make me buy a second rice cooker to compare side by side? Ugh.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The popular press report says that washing doesn’t make a difference. The actual, paywalled study says they did find a highly significant interaction between washing and type of rice, which is a level of statistical sophistication that a food writer might not grasp. In fact, even the scientific authors seem not to have commented much on the interaction.

      In their data, it looks like washing 0-amylose glutinous rice makes it more sticky, while washing medium-grain 21% amylose rice even just 3 times makes it less sticky, and that 13% amylose Jasmine rice is just kind of all over the place or not systematically influenced by washing. They didn’t do a big table of adjusted post hocs, so it’s difficult to tell which specific groups are different from which others.

      They also cooked the rices differently, using 1:1.3 rice:water for the glutinous and 1:1.6 for the medium and Jasmine, which obviously might confound their observations.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree. Also depends on the rice. Basmati doesn’t seem to stick like most white rices.