• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Why would a few tweaks negatively affect their quality of life? I completely agree the marketing is scummy and a gimmick but it is the next step in this type of research, if you ignore the spin.

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      Physically, hips. Bane of larger wolves. Then we have how that new fur changes their comfort and heat regulation . It’s more than cosmetic: hundreds of variables

      Then there is psychology: how all this affects their feelings, how it affects other wolves interacting with them.

      Notice the pups are bottle fed: lack of maternal care. Having taken in many dogs, I know that really is important. Then, finally isolation.

      Given how the press release and non peer reviewed paper overhypes. I’m not sure if I would want these people to be my vet, never mind dna tinkers.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Maybe you are right. The lack of transparency is the most concerning to me and in that situation maybe it’s best not to assume that the changes are benign. It’s up to them to prove they are, which so far they haven’t done.