• CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t understand how they can get him for anything in relation to handling the gun. None of the safety stuff is the actor’s job.

    Now since he was one of the head honchos on the picture they could go after him for negligence there, but the whole “pull the trigger” thing is weird to me. Actors do that on set all the time while pointing weapons they’ve been given at crew. It’s part of making movies.

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The actor said at the time that he drew back the hammer on the pistol, but did not pull the trigger.

    Charges were dropped […] after it was reported that the .45 Colt revolver had been modified with a new trigger in a way that could have made a misfire more likely.

    Experts […] concluded there was no way for the gun to have been fired without the trigger being pulled.

  • Hobart_the_GoKart@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t that be double jeopardy? Or no because he wasn’t tried? Genuine question… I don’t know a lot of the details.

    • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think what you’re saying is correct in terms of him not being tried. You can’t be tried for the same crime twice.

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He hasn’t been tried yet. The initial charges were dismissed before trial started. Those details were in the article.