New Mexico prosecutors plan to recharge Alec Baldwin with involuntary manslaughter over a fatal on-set shooting in October 2021.

The prosecutors dismissed charges against the Emmy award-winning actor in April, just two weeks before his trial was due to start.

But “additional facts” merit bringing the case again before a grand jury next month, they said.

  • iamericandre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    If the charges were dismissed wouldn’t that be considered double jeopardy charging him again for the same crime?

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dismissed charges is not the same as going through trial and being acquitted

    • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Isn’t double jeopardy being tried for the same crime twice? It says the charges were dropped two weeks before going to trial, so he hasn’t been tried for it yet.

  • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Out of all the people that know 100% Baldwin is guilty of manslaughter, how many would flip their opinion in an instant if Trump killed someone while filming a pro gun campaign ad?

    • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      100%? How is that?

      A learned intermediary handed him a dangerous tool and said it was good to go.

      If the pharmacist gives you the wrong pills filling a script for your kid, and your kid takes them and dies, you’re not liable for manslaughter.

      It is generally reasonable to rely on the professional representations of a learned intermediary, especially in a case where the intermediary’s profession is so life-and-death important.

      This was the armorer’s one contractual duty. As a producer, Baldwin took reasonable steps to protect the victim by hiring a professional armorer. That satisfies a principal’s nondelegable duty for general safety, imo. Maybe he is culpable for negligent hiring or negligent supervision, not for manslaughter, though.

      Further, what are you saying was Baldwin’s duty, here? To–after the person hired solely to inspect, load, and handle the guns, handed it to him and said it was safe–clear the chamber, take out the magazine, and inspect and reload each cartridge? Baldwin’s duties are those of an actor, not an armorer.

      If you hire a painter, does that impute a duty on your part to test the paint for lead? No, it’s the painter’s duty to perform her contract as a reasonable tradesperson.

      These are some gaping holes in your 100%.

  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m sure there’s some degree of legal culpability when you’re the one holding the gun. What’s weird to me is that anything illegal can have the word “involuntary” in the title.

    • persolb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is basically when someone is doing something illegal and stupid, but isn’t thinking about it killing someone. Then accidentally kills someone.

      Voluntary manslaughter is then when you do something that you know will kill a person, but for some reason it isn’t murder.

      For lots (most?) laws, ignorance isn’t an excuse… even though the specific charge may change.

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        It varies from state to state.

        I’ve been watching a case out in California where it ended in conviction for voluntary manslaughter instead of murder.

        The basic situation was two random guys who didn’t know each other got into an argument outside a bar ending in one shooting and killing the other.

        Under California law, the intent to kill was there, but it was an in the moment fit of rage, not planned or premeditated.

        I was on a jury in Texas with a similar situation that ended in a murder conviction because under Texas law, the intent to kill in and of itself is murder regardless of planning or premeditation.

        The sentences between the two cases were twenty years in California and thirty years in Texas, but either or both could’ve gone longer or shorter.

        Same effective crime and punishment, different labels.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Involuntary manslaughter is a form homicide that derived from negligence.

      Usually, you failed to do something that you should have done, and that failing resulted in the death of someone. In Baldwin’s case, he had an obligation to handle the firearm safely and did not.

      It’s considered “involuntary” because you didn’t intend to actually kill them.

      I’m about to get downvoted to shit here, because there’s a surprising number of people that are about to carve out exceptions because an “expert” handed it to him. That doesn’t absolve anyone of personal responsibility to behave in a safe manner…

      • Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t see any reason to downvote you, it’s a fair opinion.

        I don’t really agree. While it’s definitely good practice to handle firearm safety even with prop guns, I also don’t see any reason to expect a real gun.

        But I know very little about guns. I have never seen or even heard of someone handling one over here. I guess the USA is different and there is actually a real chance a real gun ends up between prop guns.

        • mememuseum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Real guns firing blanks are used in higher budget Hollywood films because it looks more realistic. Many TV shows will use gas blowback airsoft pistols and add muzzle flash in post production but you can tell because there are never spent casings being ejected.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It’s not called negligent manslaughter because negligence is not the only situation that can result in a charge of involuntary manslaughter. For example, in some places it can apply to an unintentional death during commission of certain misdemeanors.