I understand the intent, but feel that there are so many other loopholes that put much worse weapons on the street than a printer. Besides, my prints can barely sustain normal use, much less a bullet being fired from them. I would think that this is more of a risk to the person holding the gun than who it’s pointing at.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anything to regulate and restrict the people/end users but not address any real problems in society.

    Go after the gun companies, gun lobbies, NRA? No, never. Address housing, income, and educational inequality? That sounds complicated, tough, and expensive.

    This has similar vibes to shaming/regulating people for using too much water in their showers and for washing their cars, but when a multi-billion dollar oil company spills millions of gallons of crude into the sea causing years of environmental damage due to negligence, fine them a few million dollars and tell them they’ve been very naughty…

    So tired of politicians being in the pocket of Capitalist scumbags.