• zephyreks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    “UNRWA received reports that yesterday a group of people with trucks purporting to be from the Ministry of Health of the de facto authorities in Gaza, removed fuel and medical equipment from the Agency’s compound in the Gaza City,”

    Given that Hamas is the de facto authority in Gaza, this cannot be Hamas lmfao

    Otherwise, Hamas made no effort to disguise who they were, which is even funnier

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What the hell kind of shit take is this? This article has nothing to do with the US. As eager as you may be are (after checking post history you have a hardon for asshole comments about the US) to shit all over our government at every opportunity, this story isn’t one of them.

  • drekly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    The UN had supplies for a humanitarian crisis. 1+ million people are being evacuated, and more bombs have now been dropped than an entire year in Afghanistan. Is this not a humanitarian crisis?

    If Hamas is the government, and the aid is there, then the government has received the aid that the UN delivered?

    I’m sure there’s more to this, that’s not mentioned, but the context is odd.

      • drekly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The UN deleted the tweet and deny that it actually happened. Yet these news articles ignore that. But that doesn’t match with your extremely biased view. Genocide apologist?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        And you’re not an Israeli apologist? They haven’t agreed with either side, they simply said both are entitled to medical care, is that truly thought provoking.

  • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why weren’t the supplies properly secured? This was going to happen otherwise.

    Love all the downvotes from people who have no concept of opsec. Please keep making excuses for them.

    My goodness the hivemind has migrated. Pointing out a mistake is apparently a grave error.