• unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Bolt cutters are not a key, they are a method of bypassing the lock. they still need a warrant to do that, which is the point.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      they still need a warrant to do that

      Lol…

      In fascism, if you have the biggest gun, you do what you want. And Trump has the biggest "gun:

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The laws don’t exist though because they’re so easily circumvented. If you AES256 encrypt something today, there’s an extremely lonely chance they can’t crack it. For years.

      With a padlock they can just pull out the cutters and they’re done.

      I’m just referring to your point on why there are no laws against padlocks in this context.

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        fair enough, padlock was the wrong type of lock for the analogy. how about a vault door? sure that may not be as common, but you don’t have to support a government master key for those either.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Same thing goes for vaults, or all physical locks. It may take a little longer than a padlock but nothing comparable to the amount of time it would take to brute force good encryption. We’re talking maybe a couple of hours or days for a vault vs. millions of years.