When they let the travel bloggers in we’ll know =P You’d have to be impossibly naive to think the government wouldn’t beat to death anyone who photographed the concentration camps…
China’s government isn’t exactly known for beating people to death. The cops murdering a given ethnicity at astonishing rates is an american thing.
You see what you’re doning though? You’re starting from the assumption that the Chinese government is murderous and genocidal, and any evidence presented to you simply can be disregarded.
Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like “you lied before why should anyone believe you now”. The conclusion of my logical analysis was that “you must be corrupt to believe that”. If you’re concerned with fallacies read up on “appeal to authority” because you’re a one trick pony
When they let the travel bloggers in we’ll know =P You’d have to be impossibly naive to think the government wouldn’t beat to death anyone who photographed the concentration camps…
China’s government isn’t exactly known for beating people to death. The cops murdering a given ethnicity at astonishing rates is an american thing.
You see what you’re doning though? You’re starting from the assumption that the Chinese government is murderous and genocidal, and any evidence presented to you simply can be disregarded.
Begging the question
Removed by mod
Ad hominem
Don’t bother: this person self-identifies as a horseshoe theorist. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy.
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/thann
What else can one expect from an instance that explicitly bans “tankie shit”?
Nope, an ad hominem would be if I said something like “you lied before why should anyone believe you now”. The conclusion of my logical analysis was that “you must be corrupt to believe that”. If you’re concerned with fallacies read up on “appeal to authority” because you’re a one trick pony