After adjusting for inflation, wages are higher than at any point in U.S. history, and after adjusting for age and sex, the percentage of the population that is employed is around its peak in U.S. history.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The point of the inflation index is that it includes the same basket of things that people buy — including housing. There are some specific ways in which the official numbers can lag peoples’ experience (eg: how owners-equivalent rent is handled) but what you’re doing is suggesting something terrible, but not actually providing any real evidence for it.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes, but it’s included in the proportion to which you buy those things. So if you’re spending a lot less on other things, but more on housing, it’s a wash for your overall expenses. The point is that compared with overall expenses, wages went up more.

          • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            OK, so this is how my smooth brain thinks about it:

            Housing is double when adjusted for inflation. Milk is obviously not. I think milk has stayed flat since they started tracking it in the '90s.

            If I paid the same (adjusted for inflation) for my house and paid double (again, adjusted) for milk I would have a lot more money left over at the end of the month. I don’t think CPI takes into account how much milk I drink compared to the one house I need.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              The market basket approach they use looks at the mix of goods and services people buy. So yes, it captures the fact that housing is more of a typical person’s budget than milk.

              • yes_this_time@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                I did a quick search and couldn’t find an answer.

                I wonder if part of the disconnect is that they are using just a general “dwelling” in CPI. As opposed to price per square foot. That is, is dwelling size shrinking, while costs are growing, this could cause housing costs to be understated in CPI