Date formats. Can never tell if dd/mm/yyyy, mm/dd/yyyy, yyyy-mm-dd…
Only way I’d do it is by pissing everyone off. DD/YYYY/MM
how about YYMDMDYY
Let there be carnage: DD/YY/MMMM
This is why I always use letters for the month when I can. There’s no confusing 3 Oct 2023.
March 8th, 2023?
Yes, very good, you used the letters just like they said.
The key you need to press to get to bios.
Fuck yeah. I can’t believe this isn’t already standard
I don’t know about just one thing, but I’d love to see electric tools all use the same battery interface set of specs. It’s like the bad old days of cell phone chargers
Sometimes I think about standardized retail packaging. What if there was a set of boxes/containers, and they all stacked together nearly and transported nearly. Could save a lot of time and cost on shipping and shelving and potentially make automation easier
Well, it’s not cardboard, but I am absolutely fascinated by euroboxes.
A europallet is 1200x800mm.
Then there are euroboxes of 800x600mm, 600x400mm, 300x400mm etc.
They are stackable, reusable and recyclable and come in different types. Fully enclosed, with lid, with grid walls etc.
Machinists use them as toolboxes, bakers to transport bread and veggie vendors stack have their products on the market in euroboxes.
Interesting! Here’s a Wikipedia link for anyone wanting to know a little more
Power tool batteries.
It’s not quite what you’re talking about because they’re still brand-specific, but the batteries are a big part of why I went with Ryobi. They’ve done a really good job of sticking with their battery ecosystem IMO, and it’s now kind of a big part of their marketing so I think they’re going to stick with it for a while, at least for their regular 18v hand tools. If I ever come across some old blue Ryobi tools at a yard sale they should work just fine with the lithium batteries even though they were designed for NiCad batteries, and I’m pretty sure you can still get a dual chemistry charger that works for both kinds of battery.
I’m pretty sure that in the same time Ryobi has been around using using essentially the same batteries most of the big names are on their 2nd or 3rd battery standard.
Admittedly they haven’t been perfect, they’ve done pretty well sticking with their 18v and 40v lines, but I think they’ve had a couple different standards for smaller, lower-powered tools that have come and gone, although I like what they’ve been doing with their newer USB lithium line so I hope that sticks around. I think they also had a riding mower battery that was only around for a couple years before they replaced it with a new incomparable one.
And I’m very much a DIY homeowner weekend warrior type, if I used my tools professionally I don’t know that I’d want to depend on Ryobi, but they’re more than adequate for what I need them for.
This factor was why I decided to use Bosch blue cordless. They haven’t changed the battery interface so all the 18v tools are compatible and continue to be. Good to know about Ryobi.
The thing is, when you open up any of these batteries, they all have either standard lithium ion 18650 or 21700 cells and they are all nominally 3.7v/cell. In other words, they are standardised in every way except the interface, which just happens to fit one brand of tool.
I have an old Makita NiMH drill that I’ve converted to use the Bosch batteries. This 25 year old tool can continue to serve me because there’s no such thing as a Bosch electron and that’s what’s so beautiful about the universal laws of physics.
Camera lens mounts, increased competition within systems would be great.
A set of standards of course!
May seem like an obvious one considering where we are but standards for communication apps
If everything uses a standard like activitypub/matrix and becomes cross compatible I don’t need to have 6 different messaging apps
Provided the standard is completely backwards compatible of course I think it would be awesome to just let people have their messaging app of choice and be able to talk to everyone else (I think there might actually be an EU regulation coming that enforces this for larger messaging apps)
Singular front panel connector plug.
SQL. There are so many SQL dialects. Only if there could be a way to standardize it…
I mean, there IS a universal SQL standard that all of the major dialects are supersets of. It’s only when you get into the funky stuff that you start finding dialect-specific syntax and features.
I think this abides by the idea of this post, but I would standardize language across the world. Whether it is an existing language or a new language doesn’t really matter or maybe a mix of the biggest existing languages.
I remember reading a book where in the future everyone spoke a combination of English and Chinese. They seem pretty incompatible though.
What a dystopian nightmare!
Is it? When migrant workers are able to speak the same language as the natives, they would be able to integrate faster and look out for one another better.
Right now, large corporations make use of migrant workers who are unaware of their rights in host countries to undermine the working rights of the host workers. A diverse workforce is much less likely to unionize, and large corporations know that.
Social networks should be standardised on activity pub.
Networks are a winner takes it all situation. Standardise and allow competition within a network. Then innovation will happen much faster. We are like Romans not using the steam engine. Future historiens will wonder why we were stuck so long.
We’re getting there, with Threads implementing AP soon and any network that doesn’t do so will be locked into their own world (usually, for the worse).
The problem is that we might get a Google situation, where at first the company adheres and complies to the standard, but then they innovate so fast and confusingly, that they essentially define the standard, and all other networks have to keep up to remain part of the main flock.
In a winner takes all – that would be Google, and we will see much of the same dark patterns with AP protocols as we do with Browsers now.
Exactly
So often, the big players who have the power to grow and support standards in a major way are shitty corporations, and the altruistic, ethical organizations are tiny and broke and feeble
Fucking file formats in the scientific community. Way too many ways to do something in science and every place has their own way.
Can we agree on .hdf/.h5?
Didn’t have any knowledge about this but I will definitely note this for future projects!
check out the linux community, whole chat about file formats rn
People in my area (Portland, OR) often say “Fred Meyer’s” with an unnecessary possessive.
The grocery store is called Fred Meyer.
I mean we can’t pronounce Willamette or even couch right so what do you expect.
Screws. There should only be one blade type maybe torx? Obviously different sizes but one style.
