Linux server admin, MySQL/TSQL database admin, Python programmer, Linux gaming enthusiast and a forever GM.

  • 0 Posts
  • 111 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle







  • Barbarian@sh.itjust.workstoMemes@lemmy.mlI'm beginning to notice a pattern
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    FYI, I’m not Ukrainian. I’m Romanian. We have more skin in the game than Germany or France though. If Ukraine falls, Moldova falls 24 hours later, and allowing our brother country to go back under Russian domination is pretty unthinkable.

    Even without that existential issue, allowing democratically minded Europeans trying to walk the same path we walked 25 years ago get invaded by Russia without as much help as we can give them seems horrific to me.



  • Technically yes, but I don’t mean technology as phones/laptops/tablets/etc. Imho, the biggest factor in social isolation is atomization due to bad urban planning. When everything and anything is only accessible by car, you lose any connection with your local neighbourhood and local stores/cafes/etc.

    In environments where people walk around the neighbourhood, doing small daily shops, going to local businesses and taking mass transit to work/school/restaurants/bars, then you’re much more likely to interact with people rather than driving around in your social isolation-mobile.

    Urban planning can be considered a form of technology, which is why I said technically yes.

    EDIT: Oh, another big factor here is the loss of the third place. It still exists in some places (local pubs in British towns, local coffee shop in Portugal, etc), but in places without a socially normal “hangout spot” that is separated from both home and work/school, it’s much harder to meet acquaintances which may in time become friends.










  • There’s also the fact that appealing a judgement goes to more judges, always different than ones who have seen the case. Basically:

    1st judgement -> 1 judge

    1st appeal -> 2 different judges (must be unanimous)

    2nd appeal -> 3 different judges (must be unanimous)

    This makes corruption less common, as getting 6 different judges to all risk their career for a bribe is unlikely.

    I’m not going to claim this system is perfect. There are issues with the fact that there is no mechanism for preventing enforcement of an unjust law. If it’s on the books and it’s an open-shut case, the law will be applied no matter how unjust it is. The inverse is also true though: you can’t have unjust rulings that ignore laws the other direction, for example jury nullification of the murder of a black person (used to happen all the time in the US).

    Like most things, it’s a tradeoff. Some things are better, some are worse.