Summary: Japan has introduced strict new penalties for cyclists using mobile phones or riding under the influence, aiming to curb rising bicycle accidents. Cyclists caught using phones now face up to six months in jail or a 100,000 yen fine ($655; £508), while riding drunk can lead to three years in prison or a 500,000 yen fine ($3,278; £2,541). These rules follow a rise in bicycle accidents, which now account for over 20% of Japan’s traffic incidents, as cycling grew during the pandemic. The measures build on recent laws requiring helmets and imposing fines for cycling violations.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have seen such an idiot riding downhill with 40km/h and texting. I stayed far behind him so I at least had a chance to brake in case he made a meat crayon. Luckily I had to leave the road shortly after while he was still texting.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good, last time I was in Osaka the urban cyclists were plenty dangerous even without texting. Japan doesn’t have a great cycling infrastructure and definitely needs more safety rules because of it.

  • testuserpleaseupvote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What are those cyclists having accidents with? Magical monoliths that appear out of nowhere or… cars?

    While cycling in Tokyo, you either zigzag through convoluted residential street, risk it on large avenues with sharrows or annoy pedestrians by riding on sidewalks. This is not sustainable, something has to give.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’ve had my jaw fractured by a cyclist who knocked into me due to not paying attention. I now have an ugly scar because of it.

      There’s all kinds of obstacles in cities. Including hundreds of thousands to millions of people. I can tell you from experience that a bike going into you at 30-40 km/h will hurt.

      It’s not at all unreasonable to be against people pissing about on their phones while cycling.

      The issue is compounded by cyclists who ride through pedestrian areas, cyclists who seem to think red lights don’t apply to them, and people getting electric bikes and whizzing around effortlessly at a high speed.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Wait… You’re telling me bicycles aren’t the answer?

        Oh boy, the folks over at the fuckcars community are going to lose their shit!

        Edit: obviously I misjudged how widespread and humorless the community of fuckcars is. 🤣

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Bikes obviously have their place. For the time being, so do cars (although cities could certainly benefit from being less car-centric).

          The operator of neither should be pissing about on their phones, both for their own safety and the safety of others.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      What are those cyclists having accidents with? Magical monoliths that appear out of nowhere or… cars?

      Yeah… Whenever I’m on foot in the city I’m twice as nervous about being hit by a cyclist as I am a car.

      They ride on sidewalks, don’t stop at lights, weave through pedestrians at crosswalks, etc.

      They seem to be so full of themselves for not being in a car that they forget that they can also injure people.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This might be survivorship bias. If you get hit by a cyclist, you might - worst case Ontario - break a limb or something if they send you flying into something else. If you get hit by a driver, you are definitely going to break something and you will most likely die.

        As for how likely it is that you actually get hit - do you think it’s easier to avoid a 2’ x 6’ object moving at 15 mph or a 8’ x 16’ object moving at 45 mph?

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          As for how likely it is that you actually get hit - do you think it’s easier to avoid a 2’ x 6’ object moving at 15 mph or a 8’ x 16’ object moving at 45 mph?

          The cars are where I expect them to be - and they are much more likely to slow if they see me on the crosswalk. Dude on a bike just swerves around me at speed.

          Cyclists like to think they’re still pedestrians when it suits their purpose.

          • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            shrug Where I live, cars feel (and know) that they’re invincible and likely to suffer no punishment if they kill someone.

            Drivers like to think that they can do no wrong all the time, not just when it suits their purpose.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Whenever I’m on foot in the city I’m twice as nervous about being hit by a cyclist as I am a car.

        Then you don’t care about your life.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago
    BBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for BBC:

    Wiki: reliable - BBC is a British publicly funded broadcaster. It is considered generally reliable. This includes BBC News, BBC documentaries, and the BBC History site (on BBC Online). However, this excludes BBC projects that incorporate user-generated content (such as h2g2 and the BBC Domesday Project) and BBC publications with reduced editorial oversight (such as Collective). Statements of opinion should conform to the corresponding guideline.


    MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom


    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqd2e1j132o

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support