• birbs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I doubt this is AI. This looks right for a micro-CT angiograph.

      The blood vessels will have X-ray opaque dye injected, so they stand out on the CT. You can then set a threshold in the visualization software to filter out other tissue. The software then uses an algorithm to apply some shading to the surfaces of the unfiltered tissue to create a 3D effect.

      The red colouring is a choice of the user, it just colours darker parts red and fades out to transparency.

    • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I didn’t suspect AI, but using “captured” stood out to me as well. Assuming the data was CT like huginn sourced, this is a very processed resulting product. So whoever chose to use the term “capture” was too imprecise for my taste.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Pigeon don’t go caw, it go coo; crow go caw.

    Also this picture is nightmare fuel, thank you

  • M137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Caw? Pigeons don’t caw. It’s like OP just went “bird, I know a bird sound, caw, so I’ll use that because birds”.

    Pretty sure a similar image of OPs bead would show an empty void where the brain should be.