The Biden administration cannot enforce new protections for LGBTQ+ students in Ohio, Virginia and four other states, a federal judge ruled Monday, becoming the latest court to rebuff efforts to expand the scope of a decades-old law that prohibits sex-based discrimination.

US District Judge Danny Reeves said in a 93-page ruling that the new protections – which are set to take effect August 1 – cannot be enforced in Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio, Indiana, Virginia and West Virginia while a lawsuit brought by those states’ attorneys general plays out.

The new rules require schools to protect students from all sex discrimination, including sexual violence and sex-based harassment, expanding that definition to include discrimination based on pregnancy or pregnancy-related conditions like childbirth, termination of pregnancy or recovery from pregnancy. Compliance with the new rules is required to receive federal education aid.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    6 months ago

    Indiana claims that schools have to use a student’s preferred name (whether it be a nickname or they are trans) with parental consent.

    As my daughter can tell you, her trans friend in an Indiana public school is deadnamed by the administration despite his parents giving that consent. My daughter said she was confused every time it happened to him because she didn’t think of her friend by that name, or as a she.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Have the GOP achieved anything, anywhere over the last 5 years that wasn’t an attempt to take away people’s voting rights, to take away their reproductive rights, or to take away their human rights? Has any Republican ANYWHERE done anything to make the lives of their constituents better? Or are they just virtue signalling obstructionist assholes to the very last one?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      They cut taxes once. That’s like the one traditional-conservative achievement of the Trump Administration.

        • Triasha@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Non wealthy people had their taxes cut for a time, but raised permanently. The trump tax cuts were a wealth transfer from the working class to the owner class.

          • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s easy to cut taxes on the poor. You raise the non-taxed income limit then the upper limits of each of the tax brackets. That would give virtually all of the benefit of the tax cuts to the 99.9%. Across the board tax cuts and corporate tax cuts are designed to transfer wealth to the wealthy.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 months ago

    Red states are shit holes. Women and LGBTQ+ can’t get medical care if they need it. Women and LGBTQ+ can be fired for simply being a women or LGBTQ+. Imagine claiming to be the most free states but thinking only white male Christians are deserving of those freedoms.