We’re no longer using our old ftp, rsync, and git links for distributing OpenSSL. These were great in their day, but it’s time to move on to something better and safer. ftp://ftp.openssl.org and rsync://rsync.openssl.org are not available anymore. As of June 1, 2024, we’re also going to shut down https://ftp.openssl.org and git://git.openssl.org/openssl.git mirrors.

GitHub is becoming the main distributor of the OpenSSL releases.

  • squeakycat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    Considering the absolutely devastating performance hits 3.x brings (and the apparent design failures that make it extremely difficult if not impossible to reclaim it) I wonder if openssl’s days are numbered. WolfSSL seems to be favorable to the HAProxy team. Hopefully that can get some traction.

    • lemmyreader@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Good that you mention WolfSSL and that HAProxy team seems to like it. Years ago some Linux distributions made the switch to LibreSSL, but unfortunately that all (?) seems to have failed.

  • Kushan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I doubt many of the commentators here used any of the deprecated methods to contribute to openssl.

    It’s one thing to talk about what’s good for open source, it’s quite another to practice it.

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I doubt many commenters here have used a wheelchair ramp to access a public building. Guess we should just remove all those ramps since that accessibility doesn’t affect them. The barrier to entry for setting up a wheel chair ramp is more expensive than offering at least one non-corporate code contribution method.

      • Kushan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Your analogy would fit if the deprecated methods didn’t have a higher barrier to entry than using GitHub.

        This is less like removing the wheelchair ramps and more like removing the steps at the back of the building.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Maybe. Maybe if the back steps required an account with a US-based service owned by a publicly-traded megacorporation that is collecting your data as per the ToS just to enter. That’s a helluva barrier that should never be expected for free software.

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            And yet no actual contributor to openssl is losing sleep over this.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Fuck that… I guess we really should go with LibreSSL after all.

    Speaking of, what is its current working state?