• circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Exactly. Watching this all play out is strikingly similar to watching Trump get away with a mountain of stuff that would have put a poorer person in jail, and yet, no consequences.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      10 months ago

      Problem is the united states is running out of ammo to send. Thinking one small war could blow through our reserves so quickly is concerning.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          It was shot. That is where it went. Where else do you think ammo would go? We hold a stockpile back for our defense but we sent the majority to ukraine. We have one factory that makes ammo and that’s it.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              Personal stockpiles? Do you think the average American has 155mm round sitting in their home? Rifle rounds are not the issue.

              Ukraine needs heavy weapon rounds. We have one factory that makes 155mm rounds. I can’t remember which one stinger or javelin, they had to restart the line that had been shutdown.

              People complain about our military spending but that is what it cost to keep the capability to have a large war.

              Currently, our production is around 14K 155mm rounds a month. Ukraine was shooting that every few days. Biden is working hard to increase the capacity, but we are talking about a specialized production.

              I think the takeaway from this is that we have not seen a war like this in a very long time. The amount of ammo each side is shooting is insane.

              A quick google will find you many sources on this topic as it has become a huge issue. If we had another war, Taiwan for example, we would run out of ammo in days.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It was fascinating when the topic came up. I just always assumed we had idle capacity ready to go. That is why we spend so much to have that capacity.

                  It turns out that we just spend a lot but don’t have extra capacity.

                  Here is just one of the many articles on it.

                  https://www.businessinsider.com/pentagon-increasing-production-of-155mm-artillery-shells-2023-1

                  Currently, the US produces just over 14,000 rounds of 155mm ammunition every month. As The Washington Post reported last month, Ukrainian forces have previously fired that many rounds in the span of 48 hours.

              • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                This is what scares me - the idea that we could run out of conventional weapons during a hot war, and start having to think of all those nukes lying around “doing nothing”

                Some powers really are too much for humans. We’re not ready

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That is my concern as well. That we will run low, start at o lose and then go nuclear

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nobody wants a war between NATO and Russia because in that scenario, everybody loses.

    Russia wouldn’t win a ground conflict, but they’d sure-as-hell nuke the fuck out of every major city.

  • MonsterMonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The Lithuanian foreign minister sums up the response thus far very well here.

    “We declare red lines for ourselves, but not for Russia. We publicly tie our own hands while leaving Putin free to pillage, rape and destroy. We create strategic transparency, not strategic ambiguity. It’s time to change course.”

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I know the Baltics have more skin in the game but I have to say politically they are playing an absolute blinder at the moment. Just hard spoken, no nonsense, absolute facts coming out of each of them along with such great support.

      Hats off to them.

  • recapitated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not only is this someone talking but it’s talking about postulating about someone else’s inner thoughts. Not an event, not a change. Not fucking news.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    nobody wins or loses. it’s decades of civilian deaths and economic devastation, until someone decides to quit. people think everything is ww2 it’s just not like that.

      • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Also, the west gets to get rid of the old weapons that would otherwise have to be destroyed, while also burning through Russia’s materiel.

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      China would win. China is supplying Russia but China is not an ally of Russia. China would stop Russia the moment it’s no longer beneficial, which would be when NATO and Russia start fighting. China doesn’t care who wins, they win either way. If Russia loses China can take eastern Russia. If NATO loses, China can take Taiwan. If both wipe each other out China becomes the sole superpower.

  • bigFab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    News flash! One nation can’t win vs the strongest military country of the world + an entire continent of it’s allies!

  • nexusband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m not entirely sure on that, because whatever intel he’s getting fed on there war, has to be the best horseshit ever. I don’t think that even Putin can ignore ~15.000 lost vehicles.

    Meaning, he could very well believe he’d win.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    When you have a madman threatening nuclear confrontation, when does the probability of a first strike that might prevent significant retaliation have fewer megadeaths than being the victim of a first strike? This is the problem with sustained nuclear sabre rattling. What if its taken seriously?

  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Rhetoric is spinning up, and there’s apparently more people on here that like the idea of a literal third world war than are against it. Manufacturing consent really is the name of the game.

  • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    From the same people that claimed the Ukraine issue would be resolved in a few weeks, and Russia days from defeat dozens of times since it started. Putin has cancer and wont survive much longer, Russia was using WWII shovels to fight. NATO and the US doesnt want to win war, they want to prolong it. The MIC doesnt want to win war, they want to prolong it.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because this war brings in shit ton of money for way too many people around the world. The only ones suffering are Ukrainians. Heck, even North Korea got their economy booming! 2022 and early 2023 were tough, but oh boy the war profits started rolling in!

  • Pussydogger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    10 months ago

    Let’s exercise to defuse the situation instead. This guy like the kid at school who shouts “fight fight fight” at school!