I did a search from shitjustworks for “reddit die” and did not find https://lemmy.world/c/watchredditdie so I made https://sh.itjust.works/c/watchredditdie (unnecessarily). This should really not happen. When someone makes a community there should be a “ping” sent out to notify all other federated instances.

And from what I know, if I post to !sh.itjust.works/c/watchredditdie only users on sh.itjust.works will see the posts until other people from other instances randomly come across it somehow and subscribe? This really needs to be improved.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah there’s a tool called LCB (Lemmy Community Boost but it’s not a perfect solution to this issue. A good idea would be to have something like that built right into Lemmy, where instances can have an internal account that will look for and subscribe to communities which opt into discovery.

    Soemthing like how the join-lemmy site works where it finds instances, but for communities. Obviously this would need to be enabled and allowed by instance moderators, smaller instances and personal ones with limited space probably don’t want to pull from every community in the fediverse, but for larger ones, such a feature would be greatly beneficial.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yes. Lemmy is deep in “good enough” territory. It mostly works for most people, much of the time. But if you stray outside of the main use cases, you’re gonna be disappointed.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think it’s bad thing that content is hidden.

    To me, it’s comforting to think of cyberspace as being kind of like the real world. And in the real world, there’s distance. You can be near or far from things. You can travel, and the longer you travel the further you go. Things percolate through at a steady pace, and so everything’s not perfectly mixed but there are different zones with things going on.

    When we had cyberspace shown to us in Snow Crash or Disclosure or NetRunner, it was always a space. Like a second world you could go live a life in.

    I know it’s a loose connection, but I like how, in order to discover more instances I might have to travel to neighboring instances and then from there to others. Like each user you hear from has an instance in their username. That’s a way to discover instances.

    And having redundant communities? That’s a great idea. Then you get that separation and divergent/recombinant evolution in those communities too.

    Just a thought. As we add features, and remove constraints, from lemmy, we make serious architectural choices that will affect the way it feels and acts as space for communities to grow in.

    We call it a Fediverse not a Fedidatabase. A ‘verse is a place you go through, at a speed, taking time. A ‘verse is a vast and wide place.

  • Anon518@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The number of subscribers being completely different depending on which instance you search from is really weird/bad too IMO.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is a design conflict between on the one hand having the capability to locate and reach all instances of a thing, and on the other hand having those things be freely available to people.

    This is, incidentally, why pro-2A people are so opposed to the idea of a gun registry.

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not understanding what the conflict is between being able to locate a thing and that thing being available for use.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I didn’t say able to locate I said there being a list. But in that case being able to locate is a better term. And I didn’t say available I said freely available, which is an important distinction.

        If a thing’s existence always includes a route to finding it, that constrains its existence. Barriers in adding to the list, or in whatever finding mechanism you use, become barriers to the creation of an instance of that thing.

        That’s one problem. There are others too, but if we can’t agree on this one then we’ve no hope of discussing the others.

        • Spzi@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I didn’t say able to locate I said there being a list.

          Are you confusing comments?

          I see this in the referred comment:

          having the capability to locate

          While the word “list” does not appear.

          But mostly I think we should try to read the message, not focus on single words.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Like, do you need me to break down what happened there for you? Are you asking whether I made a mistake because you don’t know, or … for some other reason?

            Yes. I made a mistake. I think it’s weird you’re behaving as if you need me to confirm that, but sure. I thought I said “list”, and didn’t. Oops. Fortunately for me I never lie and hence it didn’t matter if I remembered what I said because I immediately recognized that “locate” is better terminology despite thinking it was your wording not mine so … are we good on that?

            What were you gonna say in terms of responding to the message?

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why is it that an instance decides for me which instances I can see? Why is it that mods are deciding for me which comments are censored?

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fuck are you talking about? You’re on Lemmy.world, crying about Lemmy.world instance mods.

          You can hop to another instance whenever you want. Lemm.ee has a very neutral defederation policy, if that’s you’re concern move there. If you want total control over federation, spin up your own instance

          Otherwise stop whining

          • Mango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            Get over yourself. I’m complaining about the format of the software, not this specific instance, though this instance IS shit.

            I think moderation removals should only censor for the people subscribed to that moderator. Stuff that needs removed for reasons like people using an instance to dump data or illegal content and whatnot should be admin territory.

            If I make my own instance, I’m still not seeing what moderators have removed elsewhere. It’s removed.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Demands software they didn’t develop and servers they don’t run abide by their self-proclaimed criteria

              Tells others to “get over yourself”