The former president has made clear once again that he believes the office should have absolute power

The D.C. Federal Court of Appeals is expected to hand down a decision on Donald Trump’s claim to “absolute” presidential immunity any day now, and the former president is upping his public pressure campaign for a favorable decision.

Early Thursday morning, Trump took to Truth Social to rant about the exemption he believes a president — or former president — should have from prosecution over crimes committed while in office. “EVEN EVENTS THAT ‘CROSS THE LINE’ MUST FALL UNDER TOTAL IMMUNITY, OR IT WILL BE YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD,” Trump wrote.

The former president argued that without total blanket immunity, the chief executive would be stripped of the “authority and decisiveness” necessary to carry out their duties in office. “Sometimes you just have to live with ‘great but slightly imperfect,’” he wrote in the all-caps post.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump demands Biden to have complete presidential immunity for any acts against him

  • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 year ago

    I want stricter enforcement on anyone with power, not less. If you have the power to create and/or enforce the laws of the nation you should be held at a higher standard to uphold them.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This situation is just so crazy. We’ve had decades of the right wing frothing at the mouth against “big government” and “activist judges”. Now that their god-king is reaching for absolute power they flip a 180 so hard they fall all over themselves to demand that we have a king instead of a country By The People, For The People.

      I know that conservatives don’t have morals or actually held beliefs: they have goals. Any time the world doesn’t jive with their goals they’ll take any position required to achieve the goal of the moment. I grew up with a right wing in the US that demanded liberty or death, but it seems that was all just a veneer over a goal to end democracy, topple the republic, and enshrine a king to rule over us all. The mask is off and a vote for Trump demonstrably makes you an enemy of the republic.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Presidents should have complete immunity!”

    “Biden should be brought to court for what he does!”

    Sooooo… Which one is it?

    • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump probably came up with this on the fly. And since there’s more intelligence in a 10L bucket of semen, both him and his followers thinks this is an awesome idea

  • moshtradamus666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is he never going to suffer any kind of consequences for being so dirty and dishonest? As a non-American I’m really impressed by what is going on.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’ll just drag on until he eventually succumbs to his decades-long suicide by cheeseburger.

      Then the DOJ put out a statement exclaiming “ah shucks, we were like this close to a conviction. We’re just as frustrated as you are!”

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Old American guy here. We’re not used to this sort of thing. All very new.

      My wife is a Filipina my age. She doesn’t see the big deal. She’s seen some shit.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let’s not forget that this bullshit actually killed at least one person.

    Ashli Babbitt, an Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer as rioters tried to breach the House chamber.
    
    Kevin D. Greeson died of a heart attack, collapsing on the sidewalk west of the Capitol on Jan. 6.
    
    Rosanne Boyland appeared to have been crushed in a stampede of fellow rioters as they surged against the police.
    
    Benjamin Philips, the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo, died of a stroke.
    

    And

    In the days and weeks after the riot, five police officers who had served at the Capitol on Jan. 6 died.

    Officer Brian D. Sicknick of the Capitol Police, who was attacked by the mob, died on Jan. 7.
    
    Officer Jeffrey Smith of the Metropolitan Police Department killed himself after the attack.
    
    Officer Howard S. Liebengood of the Capitol Police also died by suicide four days afterward.
    

    So who is responsible for the attack on January 6th?

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This idiot is really arguing that someone should be able to assassinate him without any consequences. That is the legal argument he’s making.

  • beebarfbadger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Aww, surely he didn’t mean it exactly like he said it. We must give him the benefit of the doubt since he is a rich and respectable person who wouldn’t say something like that.”

    “No, please. Do not give me the benefit of the doubt. I mean it - I WILL literally kill you if I get elected again.”

    “That could mean anything, surely he wouldn’t imply that he would kill us if he got elected. He must have misspoken or meant something else.”

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is, Trump never means what he says. Lying is like breathing for him. So no one should believe what he literally says. He can’t actually follow through on a plan to do anything, even if he wants to.

      You should believe that he wants to do what he says though. He may accidentally do something worse and not fix it. Like the trade war with China that accomplished nothing. Or the millions of unnecessary pandemic deaths. Trump isn’t dangerous because of what he will do, but because of what other people will do while he fails to act in the interests of the country.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Remember that time he ordered the assassination of an Iranian commander, on Iraqi (allied) soil, while that commander was there attending a peace conference with Iraq?

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    “… YEARS OF TRAUMA TRYING TO DETERMINE GOOD FROM BAD”

    Based on this, why should anybody ever be charged with crimes? We should all be granted total immunity from any crimes ever committed, since potentially years of trauma could result from investigating anything that’s done. We should just let bygones be bygones. Like that homeless guy that was killed in a hit&run incident on Sept 17th, 2006 at 12:31am, by some drunk driver who was never caught. We just need to move on guys, things happen, it’s over and done with. Investigating that would just lead to years of trauma trying to determine good from bad.

  • PorradaVFR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every assertion is a confession.

    “I crossed the line, don’t hold me accountable”.

    No. Everyone is equal under the law. Must be.

  • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand how this is even in play. I thought the point of immunity was to prevent active members of government being arrested or prevented from doing their duty by minor or spurious charges while in office. The example was a congressman being pulled over on his way to an important vote. Trump doesn’t have any duties anymore. The nation doesn’t give a shit if he’s in court or prison or whatever, so why should he be immune to anything? Now seems the perfect time to find out exactly what he’s done.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      He doesn’t have a lot of other directions to go. He can just ignore paying people money for all the cases hes lost so far, but he can’t ignore getting sent to prison. He’s got to play this hand to delay and try to get back in office. Self-pardons, lock up his accusers and anyone else he sees as a threat. Turn the presidency into an actual dictatorship.

      He was quoted many times saying how he liked how Putin and Kim and UN had their absolute power lined up.

    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand how this is even in play.

      Me neither. Even active presidents only have immunity in very limited circumstances. 30-40 years ago this claim would have been brushed off immediately as utterly ridiculous. That anybody would spend 1 second considering this as a real claim shows how our legal system has degenerated.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even active presidents only have immunity in very limited circumstances.

        Nope. This has never been tested in the courts. And here we are.