• Stuka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe I’ve got it wrong, but surely the statute of limitations had long since past?

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      5 years but you’d still owe the money and likely interest that the money would have made.

      Plus any other independently unlawful acts could be much longer.

      • scottywh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m curious about this statement.

        I wonder how often warrants are required to be “renewed” for one thing… Or how often they’d typically be up for renewal might be a better way to say that.

        I also find it interesting that it seems like this process could completely nullify a statute of limitations.

        • EnderLaw@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Warrants are usually good for 5-10 years.

          Statutes of limitations prohibit filing of charges after a certain amount of time, 1-5 years for standard / low-level crimes. The statute of limitations is tolled once a charge is filed with the court. Otherwise, people would just run away and hide until the statute of limitations is over.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure AI could easily cross reference obituaries with wanted pics.

    • wolfpack86@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, there’s a good documentary about their other role in fugitive apprehension called The Fugitive.

      There was also an epilogue to it called US Marshals