• JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why do people still insist Alyx isn’t 3? It’s clearly 3, it’s the continuation of the story.

  • olosta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Relaunched it to replay the demo : “uplink”, it really lived up to my memory. A self contained half hour of half life fun, with an original map that show off diverse game mechanics. This was really a great demo back in the day.

  • danque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    So is Half-life: source now the old one or is Half-life the old version? Or did they revamp both? It is a bit unclear in my library.

    • vhj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The one just named “Half Life” is the definitive version now, the one that got the big update yesterday.

      Source is the same messy version as it was before and they haven’t touched it. Though it will still be in our libraries for legacy versions.

      Valve themselves recommend you ignore Source exists now.

      • slaacaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What is their reason for abandoning the source version? I would assume it looks better, and it would be easier to fit for today’s gaming needs

        • vhj@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you ask me, the Source version didn’t include any QoL improvements or anything that might make the game more modern feeling.

          The “upgrades” are mostly new textures and effects that bugged out half the time. Plus all the gameplay bugs that it introduced.

          Even before the update most people were recommending the OG above the Source version, so it makes sense that they would update that one.