You must log in or # to comment.
That took me a few parsings. At first I thought they meant a researcher had continued working around the glacier for 66 years, unaware that the world had moved on.
Yeah, it’s a muddled headline.
Good article though.
And a much clearer version only needs two more words:
Remains of Antarctic researcher, who worked for Falklands’ Dependency 66 years ago, found in receding glacier
I agree that it was a good article, though. Editors must have to take a class in headline obstruction.
Edit: maybe I’m wrong; there are many better headlines about this story. The one OP found is uniquely bad:
- Remains of British researcher lost in 1959 recovered from Antarctic glacier
- Melting ice reveals remains of Antarctic researcher who vanished 66 years ago
- Body of Antarctic researcher found 66 years after he disappeared exploring glacier
- Remains of U.K. researcher who vanished in 1959 found on Antarctic glacier: “Shocked and amazed”
- Remains of a Lost Antarctic Researcher Are Finally Recovered, 66 Years After He Fell Into a Crevasse
- After 66 Years, Melting Glacier Releases Antarctic Researcher’s Remains
- Lost researcher’s remains found on Antarctic glacier after 66 years
- Remains Of Antarctic Researcher Lost During 1959 Expedition Found After 65 Years