The Barto@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agojOIN THE REVOLUTIONsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1220arrow-down151
arrow-up1169arrow-down1imagejOIN THE REVOLUTIONsh.itjust.worksThe Barto@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareaodhsishaj@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·1 year agoKinda shitty to talk about art, revolution and freedom using AI trained on stolen artwork
minus-squareicepuncher69@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoIts kind of on brand when you take into account what they mean when they say “revolution”. (I.e. china’s take on intellectual property)
minus-squarelepthesr@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAlso bad taking credit for something you couldn’t think of. I could think about ten between mountains and trees.
minus-squareArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThe AI was trained on publicly-available artwork, posted on websites with ToS (at the time of training) that allowed it to be used for training AI.
minus-squareaodhsishaj@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWhere is your source for that? Because the lawsuits and lack of transparency in what the models were trained on dispute your claim. https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/01/artists-file-class-action-lawsuit-against-ai-image-generator-companies/ https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-lawsuit-getty-images-stable-diffusion Those were just the first two I could find
Kinda shitty to talk about art, revolution and freedom using AI trained on stolen artwork
Its kind of on brand when you take into account what they mean when they say “revolution”. (I.e. china’s take on intellectual property)
Also bad taking credit for something you couldn’t think of. I could think about ten between mountains and trees.
The AI was trained on publicly-available artwork, posted on websites with ToS (at the time of training) that allowed it to be used for training AI.
Where is your source for that? Because the lawsuits and lack of transparency in what the models were trained on dispute your claim.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/01/artists-file-class-action-lawsuit-against-ai-image-generator-companies/
https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/6/23587393/ai-art-copyright-lawsuit-getty-images-stable-diffusion
Those were just the first two I could find